🟢 Tomato puree VS 🔴 Purslane
Here's the straight comparison: Purslane contains 248 mg oxalate per serving. Tomato puree? 2 mg. That 124x gap means Purslane is the clear winner for anyone tracking oxalate for kidney stone prevention.
⚖️ Head-to-Head Comparison
Per 100 g: 0 mg oxalate
Sodium: — | Calcium: — | Protein: —
Per 100 g: 621 mg oxalate
Sodium: 45 mg/100g | Calcium: 65 mg/100g | Protein: 2.0 g/100g
🏆 The Verdict: Choose Tomato puree
At 2 mg oxalate per serving (rated Safe), Tomato puree is the clear winner over Purslane (248 mg, Avoid). The 124x difference comes from Harvard's 2024 lab measurements — this isn't an estimate or guess. Build your meals around Tomato puree and use Purslane sparingly, if at all.
🔍 Key Takeaways
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for kidney stones — Purslane or Tomato puree?
The numbers leave no doubt: Tomato puree (2 mg oxalate/serving, Safe) beats Purslane (248 mg, Avoid) by a factor of 124x. For kidney stone patients, Tomato puree is the pick. Purslane is a food to approach with portion awareness.
Can I eat Purslane and Tomato puree together?
You can, but be aware of the math. Together they'd total about 250 mg oxalate — which is in Avoid territory. If both are in one meal, the oxalate load adds up. Better strategy: make Tomato puree the main component and use Purslane sparingly.
How should I prepare Purslane vs Tomato puree differently?
Key difference: Purslane benefits significantly from boiling (discard the water!) — that can reduce oxalate by 30-50%. Tomato puree doesn't need special prep since its oxalate is already low. Roasting, steaming, or eating raw are all fine for the low-oxalate option.
What are good substitutes if I want to avoid Purslane?
Your best bet: Tomato puree. It's in the same category and has dramatically less oxalate. Check the Related Foods section on Purslane's page for more specific alternatives verified by Harvard's 2024 data.